In response to “Judy’s Union Dues”
The Sunday, October 17th edition of the Winnipeg Sun ran a piece titled “Judy’s Union Dues”, commenting on CUPE support for Judy Wasylycia-Leis.
It states in part:”It’s business, really. Unions are in the business of getting the most money for their members as possible and the best job security regardless of the taxpayers’ ability to pay”. It goes on to say, “So obviously they’re going to work for Judy and any other city council candidate that pledges their allegiance to the brotherhood”.
What is conspicuously absent in the article is any reference to two other large civic unions, the Winnipeg Police Association and the United Firefighters of Winnipeg. Both have come out and endorsed The Sam and are working to see him get re-elected.
Should we assume that their motives are different than those of CUPE? Should we assume that their mandate is not to get the very best possible compensation package and job security for their members quite apart from the city’s ability to pay? And should we assume that as they are endorsing and working for The Sam, that The Sam has pledged his allegiance to their ‘brotherhood’?
I think perhaps no to the first and yes to the second assumption would be the correct answer.